We received a client who had been represented by a number of lawyers, without her affairs in conjunction with her ex-husband being finished. As part of the proceedings, the ex-husband petitioned for custody of the minor child and alternatively to move from Jerusalem to the central region. After conducting proceedings, we were able to prove that the subject was a “serial plaintiff” who doesn’t stop harassing with constant actions, and there is nothing in his attempts to get custody or visitation. The court cautioned the petitioner not to continue with idle proceedings, so that he will not be blocked in an unusual way from submitting claims.
